Art can be categorized in many ways. I used to divide pictures into three categories: pictures that have a clear meaning, those that might have something to say (probably something different to different persons), and those that are just pretty. Are their values different?
For a long time I thought that only the meaningful pictures are worth of doing, therefore I didnt allow myself to do what I wanted to do. I censored my imagination heavily. For example painting a beautiful field was forbidden. As a result I didnt do actually anything (I didnt sketch randomly at all, which didnt make things easier). If I happened to get an idea, my drawing and painting skills were so weak, that I couldnt do a picture that I could be happy with. And then my interest to art nearly disappeared.
And a meaning, that's invented by force, isn't often very good.
I think that hobbies are for enjoyment and relaxation. It wasnt clever to make myself do something that I didnt want to do, and it was even more silly to forbid all the nice things from myself. When I didnt enjoy as much of drawing/painting as I used to, I didnt get ideas and I wasnt happy with myself, and then I enjoyed even less of art it was a real rat race.
Now Ive decided to do anything I ever want to, Ill try to forget that censoring completely. It took a long time to realize one thing: art has always been done for many reasons, and they all have their own and different, but equally important, purpose.
***
And then back to this world

: After a couple of weeks I start my studies at an university of applied sciences. I'm going to study environmental technology, actually environmental planning. It's going to be an excitinhg year, as I'm moving from my parents' house etc.
